@bowlingbun This is the house, as you can see the entrance is on a tight corner. She doesn’t use her mobility scooter all the time, only when she needs to because of the pain.
As you will see too, it looks little more than a glorified bedsit as it’s only a ground floor property. Is this what we shove disabled people in now?
It’s the fact that the house is also two streets away. There is nothing wrong with the area per se, she isn’t moving due to exploitation from neighbours because they’ve mainly been okay the 15 years we’ve lived there. The landlord is good, they deal with everything quickly.
It’s more about her mental health. She can live independent and at times I think what are the carers really for. She needs stimulation from people around her. She also needs to be somewhere which understands her needs.
I do have carers support and they are even agreeing that mum needs so much more than social services are offering. Social services are refusing to acknowledge the mental health side of things and asking her to engage with mental health services. Call me a traditionalist, but I do not believe all mental health problems can be solved by NHS therapy and counselling alone. More conventional methods such as communities and activities also play a part in this which is why we are seeking this accommodation. These places offer games, activities, trips, and can even sign post support when it’s needed.
Even another social worker said to me that she would benefit from sheltered accommodation. Yes the extra care argued she could be exploited and let dangerous people in the facility. But then couldn’t that happen to anyone in the facility. I thought the point of these facilities was to help people live independently and avoid harm in the community. As multiple people have said, it’s not about who gets let in, people are hardly going to exploit someone if there are staff members and cctv present. This is about who won’t be able to get in. I hundred percent believe they are just trying to take people off the list.
Also to blame a victim of domestic abuse is totally wrong. I’ve heard reports that the police refuse to deal with most cases because “women are most likely to go back to the person anyway.” I don’t know how likely true this but it seems like this is essentially the attitude extra care are taking. She had no prior affiliation with her abuser, and hasn’t since. There is no reason to associate with him.
In my line of work, it’s also common that the general rule is ‘innocent until proven guilty’ it’s abit more complex than that, but it makes complete sense. The fact is an investigation took place a year ago and no evidence was ever found. Therefore she was proven innocent. It’s wrong to assume someone is a dangerous person because someone made an allegation up which proved to be untrue and an act of harrassment towards the victim. The police and the cps did their jobs and no evidence was present and therefore she is innocent. Would someone who was guilty have support from women’s aid and be referred as a high priority to a thing called Marak?
I also don’t think it’s my job to ensure that the other person living there is considered safe.
I’ve had a carers assessment and they are supporting me with advice, however social services don’t want to listen to any of my health issues.