Potential changes to social care packages: > Yesterday the National Care Forum confirmed that six local authorities in England have already applied the so called ‘easement’ power to social care. This means that local authorities could reduce or even stop providing care to some people if the local situation becomes critical. The areas which have currently switched on the easement power are; > Sunderland City Council, Middlesbrough, Warwickshire, Staffordshire County Council, Birmingham City Council and Solihull Council. > ”
Dreading them trying to cut S’s package, I’m already on my knees from having him home 24/7 for 4 weeks of lockdown.
Melly? Can I ask who sent you that email? I for one would like to be informed about things like this if there’s a mailing list to join or some such? Thanks.
I am furious, that early March the ‘team’ which included the said LA, held a 117 meeting. My son’s new rude and obnoxious allocation decided to demand a reassessment of my son’s package at this meeting. She demanded a separate meeting with her. Then she decided later that this meeting she had arranged to reassess would be cancelled the week before lockdown, for some petty reason. She then informed me, it was a review she was going to do (after taking issue and blame mongering regarding reassessment, at the original 117 meeting). Since her last arrangement to come out and so-called ‘review’ well that went down the drain, due to the coronavirus and lockdown. No doubt, she plans ‘to pick it all up’ as soon as lockdown is over.
However, in view of the coronavirus Act which has occurred since I have decided when she picks up this review of my son’s package, I am going to insist a coronavirus test is done on her (and anyone else she wants to bring with her), the day before she arranges to come out ‘visiting’. I feel it’s reasonable given both myself and son are in the high-risk group and there’s no vaccine developed yet. I imagine (just by the attitude she had at the 117 meeting) that she’ll be as awkward as sin about complying with a test. It could, therefore, take many months/years even, for her visit to take place.
Hi Honeybadger, Your absolutely right. Side-stepping the elephant is going to be difficult…however there is a way to clear the entire room of elephants, by setting the mouse free. We have been trapped for some considerable time now…by the same political structure, whether it is in place or not…it always has been an unstable structure, which falls down at random. It is now built on the Coronavirus Act, which is leaning precariously. It’s something that can’t be ignored either as it is ‘the latest weapon’ to use against people who need support and it’s just as lethal, as the ignoring method, that has always been in place during the Care Act. They slashed my son’s care on 117 aftercare to less than half, in 2013…I went to the ombudsman won my case but never won the respite back as it was before.
I know this system well…as a total letdown and disregard of the care needs of many and I will never bow to it nor the paid workers who try to apply it.
The council run company whose support workers looked after those with complex learning disabilities. Was that before Covid or in response to Covid?
Either way its totally unacceptable
I can only begin to imagine how the families must feel.
(Before covid, my son had hardly any services anyway).
Re- deployed to look after the elderly…unbelievable… they should have got those workers from somewhere else . It takes time to build relationships even more so for people with disabilities.
What happened to those with complex disabilities… are the parents now having to care for them?